• home
  • about
    • emotional intelligence at work
    • GradStart (graduate performance at work)
    • Jeremy Marchant
    • this website
  • how we help
    • people
    • teams
    • businesses
    • other organisations
  • what’s the problem?
  • blog and diversions
    • Jeremy Marchant’s blog
    • newsletters
    • quotations
    • music
    • diverting videos
  • contact
emotional intelligence at work
jeremy@emotionalintelligenceatwork.com | 01453 764 615
Intelligence at Work Linkedin Link Intelligence at Work Twitter Link Intelligence at Work Youtube Link
  • essential
    • relationships at work
    • leadership
    • communication
    • emotional intelligence
  • people
    • leadership
    • personal growth
    • managing people
    • successful teams
    • conflict resolution
    • employability
  • business
    • networking and advocacy
    • business growth and change
    • customer service
    • employability
  • stories
    • work stories
    • more stories
  • short pieces
  • long reads
  • videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • emotionally intelligent videos

Blog

24
MAY
2016

Four misconceptions about applying for a job

by : Jeremy Marchant
comment : 0

paper-pile-1238396 1

Four very common misconceptions:

1   The purpose of the application is to get the job.

No, the purpose of the application is to get an interview. This is not the same thing and, unless the jobs you seek are offered without interview, you have to get through the interview before you’ll be considered for the job.

It isn’t good enough to send a standard CV with a covering letter which you “tweak” for each recipient.  Each application should be completely tailored for its recipient. If it isn’t, that’s the first thing to fix. People understandably don’t like being addressed as if they are an anonymous member of a crowd, and you can be certain that other applicant swill have produced the personalised applications I encourage.  You need to show that you recognise the uniqueness of the business to which you are applying and its current circumstances and needs.

2   The application is about you.

No, the application is about the company you are applying to join. Or, more accurately, it’s about how your presence in their midst will enhance their business in the short and long term. It’s about how they will benefit.

So you need to research thoroughly every business to which you apply. Better twelve high quality applications than countless generic ones which, at worst, might actually offend the recipient.

3   Employers know how to recruit.

I am afraid not. Even recruitment agencies vary widely in their competence. Many employers don’t really know what their business needs are in terms of extra staff, other than in the immediate future, because they have only a hazy concept of what the business’s medium and longterm future is. Your application should, therefore, do their work for them, without of course being condescending.

4   Poor presentation doesn’t matter.

Oh yes it does. Poor presentation is the fastest route to the shredder. Spelling errors, grammatical errors, poor layout of the CV and any accompanying material are not on. You need a good recent picture of you, and you should prominently display your contact details.

Ultimately, it is not a rational process whereby you provide factual information about your learning, experience and attributes, and the recruiter rationally assesses this information in the light of similar information received from other applicants and his/her deep understanding of the business’s needs.

The recruiter will respond to your application emotionally and the decision to invite you or not to an interview will be made from an emotional position. It’s probably better to think of the recruiter, faced with yet another application, asking him/herself, “Just why should I spend even half an hour talking to this person—or even reading this application any further?”

© Jeremy Marchant 2016 . image: Free images

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Further reading

  • Book review:  Gail Honeyman, Eleanor Oliphant is completely fineBook review: Gail Honeyman, Eleanor Oliphant is completely fine
  • Why is a speaker like a pianist?Why is a speaker like a pianist?
  • Why brexit won’t happen―1Why brexit won’t happen―1
  • Why you can’t “measure” customer serviceWhy you can’t “measure” customer service
  • Journalists:  a suitable case for treatmentJournalists: a suitable case for treatment
  • Scottish referendum:  what a shamblesScottish referendum: what a shambles
  • Why it’s not necessary to believe God doesn’t existWhy it’s not necessary to believe God doesn’t exist
  • The twenty first century chamber of commerceThe twenty first century chamber of commerce
  • Save our climate?—unlikelySave our climate?—unlikely
  • EU referendum—6: Does the EU manage cross-state situations well?EU referendum—6: Does the EU manage cross-state situations well?