• home
  • about
    • emotional intelligence at work
    • GradStart (graduate performance at work)
    • Jeremy Marchant
    • this website
  • how we help
    • people
    • teams
    • businesses
    • other organisations
  • what’s the problem?
  • blog and diversions
    • Jeremy Marchant’s blog
    • newsletters
    • quotations
    • music
    • diverting videos
  • contact
emotional intelligence at work
jeremy@emotionalintelligenceatwork.com | 01453 764 615
Intelligence at Work Linkedin Link Intelligence at Work Twitter Link Intelligence at Work Youtube Link
  • essential
    • relationships at work
    • leadership
    • communication
    • emotional intelligence
  • people
    • leadership
    • personal growth
    • managing people
    • successful teams
    • conflict resolution
    • employability
  • business
    • networking and advocacy
    • business growth and change
    • customer service
    • employability
  • stories
    • work stories
    • more stories
  • short pieces
  • long reads
  • videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • emotionally intelligent videos

Blog

27
OCT
2013

Guilt: the gift that just keeps giving

by : Jeremy Marchant
comment : 0

692910_55736029

A recent LinkedIn thread set up this assertion for comment: “After failure, shame is harmful, guilt is productive”.

There appears to be a degree of blurring of the definitions of guilt and shame, both in common parlance and amongst those who ought to know better. So, for the purpose of this blog: guilt is “I did a bad thing”, shame is “I am a bad person”.

Shame is invariably toxic, in the sense that noone is intrinsically a “bad” person. There isn’t, pace various religious philosophies, an external agency, independent of humans, which weighs people in the balance and finds them wanting. The idea that a person can be bad is a construct of some societies and cultures, and/or is a personal construct.

The idea of doing a “bad” thing, however, is a meaningful concept. Societies and cultures have standards of both morals and ethics which they develop and refine as needs arise. (People in the societies may believe that the agency for these standards is supernatural, but that is just a belief.) If a member of a society contravenes a precept of the local moral code, he or she is justified in feeling guilty, just as the fellow members of the society perceive him/her to be.

In many societies (all?) such moral and ethical codes are enshrined in legal frameworks which seek to impose a punative or retributive penance on the wrongdoer. Once the penance is completed, the slate is, in theory, wiped clean.

But there are countless ways in which we judge ourselves and find ourselves guilty of offences which transgress our personal moral codes—“I should have visited my grandmother more often, and now she’s dead”. Because there is no societal way or, in mot cultures, a familial route to paying a penance and wiping the slate clean, we continue to torture ourselves with guilt. (Not entirely facetiously, it may be the case that grannie found us a bore and was relived not to have to put up with us more often!)

Guilt becomes a response that we use to stop ourselves from moving forward in our lives. What is particularly pernicious about guilt, though, is that that it stops us from taking responsibility, which would be a far more productive approach because something useful might actually come from it.

The deed is done. Any damage has been caused and, if necessary, dealt with by the affected people. Anything constructive to repair the situation should have been done and it is time to move on.

As Edward FitzGerald wrote in his poem, The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám

The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it.

 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Further reading

  • EU referendum—6: Does the EU manage cross-state situations well?EU referendum—6: Does the EU manage cross-state situations well?
  • Why Mr Jeremy Corbyn would be advised to goWhy Mr Jeremy Corbyn would be advised to go
  • What businesses need to learn from Nigel Farage*What businesses need to learn from Nigel Farage*
  • Getting the news wrong—1Getting the news wrong—1
  • Why call centres can’t, won’t and don’t help youWhy call centres can’t, won’t and don’t help you
  • EU referendum—3:  another shambles loomingEU referendum—3: another shambles looming
  • Free speech nailed—2Free speech nailed—2
  • How the NHS handles complaints:  does the ombudsman nail it?How the NHS handles complaints: does the ombudsman nail it?
  • Games people play on LinkedIn—1:  «Expert»Games people play on LinkedIn—1: «Expert»
  • Referendum:  clearing up the mess—1:  The numbersReferendum: clearing up the mess—1: The numbers