• home
  • about
    • emotional intelligence at work
    • GradStart (graduate performance at work)
    • Jeremy Marchant
    • this website
  • how we help
    • people
    • teams
    • businesses
    • other organisations
  • what’s the problem?
  • blog and diversions
    • Jeremy Marchant’s blog
    • newsletters
    • quotations
    • music
    • diverting videos
  • contact
emotional intelligence at work
jeremy@emotionalintelligenceatwork.com | 01453 764 615
Intelligence at Work Linkedin Link Intelligence at Work Twitter Link Intelligence at Work Youtube Link
  • essential
    • relationships at work
    • leadership
    • communication
    • emotional intelligence
  • people
    • leadership
    • personal growth
    • managing people
    • successful teams
    • conflict resolution
    • employability
  • business
    • networking and advocacy
    • business growth and change
    • customer service
    • employability
  • stories
    • work stories
    • more stories
  • short pieces
  • long reads
  • videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • Jeremy Marchant’s videos
    • emotionally intelligent videos

A short piece about nature versus nurture

536480_97328080

One still comes across, with depressing frequency, articles which ask whether nature or nurture is responsible for a human trait. The writer posits some debate or argument which he or she imagines is engaged in by academics around the world.

I suggest that “nature”, all by itself, plays no part whatever in developing a person’s characteristics.  Nature doesn’t have exclusive access to the individual at any point.

“Nurture”, all by itself, plays no part whatever in developing a person’s characteristics.  Noone can nurture another person without a consideration of how that person has been affected by environment, heredity and so on.

It’s neither—it’s a third thing

What does create them is a third thing. That third thing is a prior, complex interaction between “nature” and “nurture”. It is this interaction which drives the development of the characteristics. I don’t mean nature and nurture together—that’s two things. I mean this interaction.

If you take a taxi to London, the driver by him or herself doesn’t get you there. The car, by itself, doesn’t get you there. Not even the driver and the car together get you there—imagine the former standing beside the latter, smiling for the camera. No, it is the interaction of the two which provides the service.

So, it’s not nature and nurture working together in some sort of a team.  It isn’t nature + nurture.  It’s nature × nurture .

Luckily, I am not alone in this view. Allan Schore makes the case for nature × nurture in a much more nuanced and detailed way than I could in this interesting video.

by Jeremy Marchant . © 2015 Jeremy Marchant Limited . revised 1 june 2015 . image:  Free images

Further reading

  • «Network better»:  the pitch«Network better»: the pitch
  • One off specialOne off special
  • A short piece about why we behave the way we doA short piece about why we behave the way we do
  • Expecting a responseExpecting a response
  • x = x + 1x = x + 1
  • Seven ways for better teamworkSeven ways for better teamwork
  • On being a parent : on being a child—3On being a parent : on being a child—3
  • Stop selling!—1: Two barrelsStop selling!—1: Two barrels
  • A few snowballsA few snowballs
  • OasisOasis